linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 07/10] sched: add a macro to ref all CLONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:41:31 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	sgrubb@...hat.com, eparis@...isplace.org, pmoore@...hat.com,
	arozansk@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, serge@...lyn.com,
	zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 07/10] sched: add a macro to ref all CLONE_NEW* flags

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:42:50AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/04/17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:35:54AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Added the macro CLONE_NEW_MASK_ALL to refer to all CLONE_NEW* flags.
> > 
> > A wee bit about why might be nice..
> 
> It makes the following patch much cleaner to read:
> 	[PATCH V6 08/10] fork: audit on creation of new namespace(s)
> 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/50
> 
> I was hoping it might also make a lot of other code cleaner, but most of
> the other places where multiple CLONE_NEW* flags are used, not all six
> are used together, but only 5 are used.  Ok, so it is helpful in 1 of 3:
> 
> It would actually be useful in check_unshare_flags():
> 	https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v3.17/kernel/fork.c#L1791
> 
> but not in copy_namespaces() or unshare_nsproxy_namespaces():
> 	https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v3.17/kernel/nsproxy.c#L130
> 	https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v3.17/kernel/nsproxy.c#L183
> 

Right, so no objections from me on this, its just that I only saw this
one patch in isolation without context and the changelog failed on
rationale.

Does it perchance make sense to fold this patch into the next patch that
actually makes use of it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/