lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:52:27 +0200
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
	jszhang@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework flash detection and timing setup

Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com> writes:

>> Also, as soon as Robert moves pxa3xx boards fully to DT, we'll loose
>> the pdata timings option above. *sigh*
>> 
> Well, such move would include proper timing DT properties for non-ONFI
> devices.
I will move several boards to DT, including several pxa3x boards, but not _all_
the boards.

For reference, I said in [1] this :
> Actually, this deserves another discussion alltogether. My plan was not to
> convert all pxa board files to dt support, but all internal SoC IPs drivers +
> mach/plat support.
> 
> Or put another way at the end :
>  - there will be at least one pxa25x board which is fully DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa27x board which is fully DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa3xx board which is fully DT converted
> 
>  - there will be at least one pxa25x board which is not DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa27x board which is not DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa3xx board which is not DT converted
> 
> I want to keep the support for both legacy platform_data and DT for pxa
> architecture. The idea I had was that only fully DT converted machines will
> benefit from multiplatform support.

And as you said Ezequiel, the problem will arise regardless of being DT or not,
it's a lack of conformance of the zylonite board's nand amongst others.

So the timings will have to survive somewhere, whichever place is seen fit.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

[1] http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2015/03/24/101
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ