linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] selftest/x86: install tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:35:19 -0700
From:	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] selftest/x86: install tests

On 17 April 2015 at 15:28, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Include lib.mk and set TEST_PROGS where appropriate. Skip the install and test
>> case when CROSS_COMPILE is not set.
>>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 9 +++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
>> index 9962e10..622717e 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
>> @@ -12,19 +12,28 @@ UNAME_M := $(shell uname -m)
>>  ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
>>  # Always build 32-bit tests
>>  all: all_32
>> +# Install 32-bit tests
>> +TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_32) run_x86_tests.sh
>>  # If we're on a 64-bit host, build 64-bit tests as well
>>  ifeq ($(UNAME_M),x86_64)
>>  all: all_32 all_64
>> +# Install 64-bit tests
>> +TEST_PROGS += $(BINARIES_64)
>>  endif
>>  else
>>  # No dependency on all when cross building
>>  all:
>> +# Skip install and test case when not built
>> +override INSTALL_RULE :=
>> +override EMIT_TESTS :=  echo "echo \"selftests: run_x86_tests.sh [SKIP]\""
>
> I may just be confused, but why is an emply TEST_PROGS insufficient?

This is a good question. The default install in lib.mk rule blindly
calls 'install -t <INSTALL_PATH>  <TEST_PROG>' which fails the install
as it is not enough arguments passed. Perhaps we fix this behavior in
lib.mk.

>
> --Andy
>
>>  endif
>>
>>  all_32: check_build32 $(BINARIES_32)
>>
>>  all_64: $(BINARIES_64)
>>
>> +include ../lib.mk
>> +
>>  clean:
>>         $(RM) $(BINARIES_32) $(BINARIES_64)
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andy Lutomirski
> AMA Capital Management, LLC



-- 
Tyler Baker
Tech Lead, LAVA
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/