linux-kernel - Re: sparc64: Build failure due to commit f1600e549b94 (sparc: Make sparc64 use scalable lib/iommu-common.c functions)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:25:29 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Cc:	linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc64: Build failure due to commit f1600e549b94 (sparc: Make
 sparc64 use scalable lib/iommu-common.c functions)

From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:05:10 -0400

> But when I clone 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
> and do a git show of the commit-id above, I see deltas that
> dont make sense (they seem to be from a patchset from somewhere
> in the middle of the review chain from the thread). 
> 
> What am I missing? 

I am pretty sure I applied V10 of your IOMMU submission.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459804/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459803/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459802/

and follow-on parisc build fix:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461905/

if I somehow botched this up, wow that's impressive :-)

If you can sort out what I did wrong and send me a relative
fixup patch, I'd really appreciate it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/