linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/24] link_path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:04:53 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/24] link_path_walk: kill the recursion

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>   */
>  static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
>  {
> +       struct saved {
> +               struct path link;
> +               void *cookie;
> +               const char *name;
> +       } stack[MAX_NESTED_LINKS], *last = stack + nd->depth - 1;
>         struct path next;
>         int err;

I was going to complain about this, and suggest that you move it to
the nameidata, but I see that you did that later.

That said, you then introduce a stack-allocated "struct saved stack[]"
in path_mountpoint[] instead, *and* nameidata is saved on stack, so
this all ends up being very stack-intensive anyway.

I might have missed some patch here, but would it be possible to just
allocate a single per-thread nameidata, and just leave it at that?
Because allocating that thing on the stack when it contains what is
now one kilobyte of array data is *not* acceptable.

Other than that, my quick scan through this looked fine. And maybe
that quick scan missed where you already did that too.

                           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/