lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:08:44 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:timers/core] hrtimer:
  Keep pointer to first timer and simplify __remove_hrtimer()

Commit-ID:  895bdfa793f6e912d1a58fc445b3dd4d686f7bd3
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/895bdfa793f6e912d1a58fc445b3dd4d686f7bd3
Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:08:49 +0000
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:06:50 +0200

hrtimer: Keep pointer to first timer and simplify __remove_hrtimer()

__remove_hrtimer() needs to evaluate the expiry time to figure out
whether the timer which is removed is eventually the first expiring
timer on the cpu. Keep a pointer to it, which is lazily updated, so we
can avoid the evaluation dance and retrieve the information from there.

Generates slightly better code.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.752838019@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 include/linux/hrtimer.h |  6 ++++++
 kernel/time/hrtimer.c   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hrtimer.h b/include/linux/hrtimer.h
index e5c22d6..d194c1d 100644
--- a/include/linux/hrtimer.h
+++ b/include/linux/hrtimer.h
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ enum  hrtimer_base_type {
  * @clock_was_set_seq:	Sequence counter of clock was set events
  * @expires_next:	absolute time of the next event which was scheduled
  *			via clock_set_next_event()
+ * @next_timer:		Pointer to the first expiring timer
  * @in_hrtirq:		hrtimer_interrupt() is currently executing
  * @hres_active:	State of high resolution mode
  * @hang_detected:	The last hrtimer interrupt detected a hang
@@ -180,6 +181,10 @@ enum  hrtimer_base_type {
  * @nr_hangs:		Total number of hrtimer interrupt hangs
  * @max_hang_time:	Maximum time spent in hrtimer_interrupt
  * @clock_base:		array of clock bases for this cpu
+ *
+ * Note: next_timer is just an optimization for __remove_hrtimer().
+ *	 Do not dereference the pointer because it is not reliable on
+ *	 cross cpu removals.
  */
 struct hrtimer_cpu_base {
 	raw_spinlock_t			lock;
@@ -191,6 +196,7 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base {
 					hres_active	: 1,
 					hang_detected	: 1;
 	ktime_t				expires_next;
+	struct hrtimer			*next_timer;
 	unsigned int			nr_events;
 	unsigned int			nr_retries;
 	unsigned int			nr_hangs;
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 0cd1e0b..30178d0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -415,12 +415,21 @@ static inline void debug_deactivate(struct hrtimer *timer)
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON) || defined(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS)
+static inline void hrtimer_update_next_timer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
+					     struct hrtimer *timer)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
+	cpu_base->next_timer = timer;
+#endif
+}
+
 static ktime_t __hrtimer_get_next_event(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base)
 {
 	struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = cpu_base->clock_base;
 	ktime_t expires, expires_next = { .tv64 = KTIME_MAX };
 	unsigned int active = cpu_base->active_bases;
 
+	hrtimer_update_next_timer(cpu_base, NULL);
 	for (; active; base++, active >>= 1) {
 		struct timerqueue_node *next;
 		struct hrtimer *timer;
@@ -431,8 +440,10 @@ static ktime_t __hrtimer_get_next_event(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base)
 		next = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active);
 		timer = container_of(next, struct hrtimer, node);
 		expires = ktime_sub(hrtimer_get_expires(timer), base->offset);
-		if (expires.tv64 < expires_next.tv64)
+		if (expires.tv64 < expires_next.tv64) {
 			expires_next = expires;
+			hrtimer_update_next_timer(cpu_base, timer);
+		}
 	}
 	/*
 	 * clock_was_set() might have changed base->offset of any of
@@ -597,6 +608,8 @@ static int hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer,
 	if (cpu_base->in_hrtirq)
 		return 0;
 
+	cpu_base->next_timer = timer;
+
 	/*
 	 * If a hang was detected in the last timer interrupt then we
 	 * do not schedule a timer which is earlier than the expiry
@@ -868,30 +881,27 @@ static void __remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer,
 			     unsigned long newstate, int reprogram)
 {
 	struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = base->cpu_base;
-	struct timerqueue_node *next_timer;
+	unsigned int state = timer->state;
 
-	if (!(timer->state & HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED))
-		goto out;
+	timer->state = newstate;
+	if (!(state & HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED))
+		return;
 
-	next_timer = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active);
 	if (!timerqueue_del(&base->active, &timer->node))
 		cpu_base->active_bases &= ~(1 << base->index);
 
-	if (&timer->node == next_timer) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
-		/* Reprogram the clock event device. if enabled */
-		if (reprogram && cpu_base->hres_active) {
-			ktime_t expires;
-
-			expires = ktime_sub(hrtimer_get_expires(timer),
-					    base->offset);
-			if (cpu_base->expires_next.tv64 == expires.tv64)
-				hrtimer_force_reprogram(cpu_base, 1);
-		}
+	/*
+	 * Note: If reprogram is false we do not update
+	 * cpu_base->next_timer. This happens when we remove the first
+	 * timer on a remote cpu. No harm as we never dereference
+	 * cpu_base->next_timer. So the worst thing what can happen is
+	 * an superflous call to hrtimer_force_reprogram() on the
+	 * remote cpu later on if the same timer gets enqueued again.
+	 */
+	if (reprogram && timer == cpu_base->next_timer)
+		hrtimer_force_reprogram(cpu_base, 1);
 #endif
-	}
-out:
-	timer->state = newstate;
 }
 
 /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ