linux-kernel - Re: regression in ktime.h circa 3.16.0-rc5+ breaks lirc irsend, bad commit 166afb64511

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:53:45 +0100
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Trevor Cordes <trevor@...nopolis.ca>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: regression in ktime.h circa 3.16.0-rc5+ breaks lirc irsend, bad
 commit 166afb64511

> > Obviously my patch isn't the real solution, the real solution is to
> > make the new function calls use a consistent 64-bit type, or figure
> > out what in my code path is calling these functions and check it for
> > value sanity.

I would be tempted to do both computations and print then inputs as well
as do a WARN_ON when they differ. That will give you a stack trace of the
offender, and providing you return the "correct" value you can see how it
continues functioning afterwards.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/