[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 22:52:46 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: enforce inlining for atomics
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
> On 22 April 2015 at 11:28, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it),
> > we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic
> > ops) always inlined.
>
> Right. As I wrote I will post a follow up patch for the remaining
> cases where inline is a must. To guarantee that performance critical
> functions are always inlined - no matter what configuration is used.
It would be nice to see those patches in -stable eventually, please...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists