[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 00:10:28 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, namhyung@...nel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core v4 2/4] perf probe: Accept filter argument for
--funcs
On 2015/05/05 23:31, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:29:50AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> This allows user to pass the filter pattern directly to
>> --funcs option as below.
>> ----
>> # ./perf probe -F *kmalloc
>> __kmalloc
>> devm_kmalloc
>> mempool_kmalloc
>> sg_kmalloc
>> sock_kmalloc
>> ----
>
> Tested, works well, so I went to try and use it in another option:
>
> [root@...andy acme]# perf probe kmalloc*
> Probe point 'kmalloc*' not found.
> Error: Failed to add events.
> [root@...andy acme]#
Well, I'm already preparing it ;)
BTW, what patches have you applied? Can I update 4/4 or would I
better make another bugfix?
Thank you,
>
> 8-)
>
> - Arnaldo
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Linux Technology Research Center, System Productivity Research Dept.
Center for Technology Innovation - Systems Engineering
Hitachi, Ltd., Research & Development Group
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists