linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 May 2015 23:46:12 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:33:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 05/02/2015 12:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release.
> > >There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >let me know.
> > >
> > >Responses should be made by Mon May  4 18:59:31 UTC 2015.
> > >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > 
> > Take two:
> > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13
> > Failed builds:
> > 	mips:defconfig
> > 	mips:allmodconfig
> > 	mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
> > 	mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
> > 	mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
> > 	mips:ath79_defconfig
> > 	mips:ar7_defconfig
> > 	mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
> > 	mips:e55_defconfig
> > 	mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
> > 	mips:malta_defconfig
> > 	powerpc:defconfig
> > 	powerpc:allmodconfig
> > 
> > Qemu test results:
> > 	total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8
> > Failed tests:
> > 	mips:mips_malta_defconfig
> > 	mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
> > 	mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
> > 	mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
> > 	mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
> > 	mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
> > 	powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
> > 	powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig
> > 
> > ---
> > Error logs:
> > 
> > mips:
> > 
> > arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
> > arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'
> > 
> > Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction
> > emulation for EVA'.
> > 
> > ---
> > powerpc:
> > 
> > include/linux/bug.h: Assembler messages:
> > include/linux/bug.h:7: Error: unrecognized opcode: `enum'
> > include/linux/bug.h:8: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
> > 
> > As mentioned earlier, bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label:
> > Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'.'.
> 
> That commit might be missing its dependencies:
> 
>  c0ccf6f99e3a jump_label: Allow jump labels to be used in assembly
>  55dd0df781e5 jump_label: Allow asm/jump_label.h to be included in assembly
> 
> But I don't think the PowerPC commit should be in -stable to begin 
> with, just like the two core patches are not.

Yes, now removed from the queue, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/