lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 23:58:13 +0000 From: Jose Rivera <German.Rivera@...escale.com> To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>, "bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com" <bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com>, "agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>, "bhamciu1@...escale.com" <bhamciu1@...escale.com>, "nir.erez@...escale.com" <nir.erez@...escale.com>, "itai.katz@...escale.com" <itai.katz@...escale.com>, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, "R89243@...escale.com" <R89243@...escale.com>, Richard Schmitt <richard.schmitt@...escale.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/7] staging: fsl-mc: Upgraded MC bus driver to match MC fw 7.0.0 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 7:13 AM > To: Rivera Jose-B46482 > Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; arnd@...db.de; > devel@...verdev.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Yoder Stuart- > B08248; Sharma Bhupesh-B45370; agraf@...e.de; Hamciuc Bogdan-BHAMCIU1; > Erez Nir-RM30794; katz Itai-RM05202; Wood Scott-B07421; Marginean > Alexandru-R89243; Schmitt Richard-B43082 > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] staging: fsl-mc: Upgraded MC bus driver to match > MC fw 7.0.0 > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:39:07PM -0500, J. German Rivera wrote: > > - Migrated MC bus driver to use DPRC flib 0.6. > > What does this mean? What is a flib? > The DPRC flib is the API to manipulate DPRC objects. > After reading the patch, apparently it means that we can remove all the > ifdefs from patch 1. :) > No, we cannot as the required GIC-ITS support is not upstream yet. I added some of the #ifdefs back that were removed by mistake. > > - Changed IRQ setup infrastructure to be able to program MSIs > > for MC objects in an object-independent way. > > Are these two things related? > No. > Why does this patch add so many new EXPORTS()s? > Removed new EXPORTs added as they are not needed yet. > regards, > dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists