linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend 1/5] spi: bcm2835: Add GPIOLIB dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 May 2015 11:28:25 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 1/5] spi: bcm2835: Add GPIOLIB dependency

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:02:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> I am aware that several other patches have been submitted to fix the
> problem (I think I have seen at least two); after all, I submitted the
> patch some three weeks ago, and many others are affected by it. I don't
> really care which one of the submitted patches is applied to mainline,
> as long as the problem is getting fixed.

So, the way to do this is to follow up on one of the existing patches.

> Repeating my comment from the patch,

> "Yes, I know, this patch is in -next. Please see this e-mail as gentle reminder
> to consider pushing it (or one of the other patches fixing the same problem)
> into mainline."

Why would I even read that far into the patch?  It's patch 1 of a
series, it looks like someone's just blindly sending old stuff.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)