| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 18:52:58 +0530 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org Subject: Re: [patch v2 for-4.0] mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> writes: > On 04/21/2015 09:31 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> writes: >> >>> On 25.2.2015 22:24, David Rientjes wrote: >>>> >>>>> alloc_pages_preferred_node() variant, change the exact_node() variant to pass >>>>> __GFP_THISNODE, and audit and adjust all callers accordingly. >>>>> .... ... >>> Right, we might be changing behavior not just for slab allocators, but >>> also others using such >>> combination of flags. >> >> Any update on this ? Did we reach a conclusion on how to go forward here >> ? > > I believe David's later version was merged already. Or what exactly are > you asking about? When I checked last time I didn't find it. Hence I asked here. Now I see that it got committed as 5265047ac30191ea24b16503165000c225f54feb Thanks -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists