[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 13:01:49 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Ronny Meeus <ronny.meeus@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Handle priority boosted tasks proper in
setscheduler()
On Tue, 5 May 2015 18:50:17 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Crap. Yes, I missed that. So __setscheduler() assumes that there is no
> boosting going on. So we need:
>
> p->prio = effective_prio(p);
>
> there instead.
Of course then we need to do something about normalize_task() (for
sysrq), which depends on it being normal_prio().
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists