linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 May 2015 15:13:09 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gabriel Dobato <dobatog@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510

On Wednesday 06 May 2015 15:06:29 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> 
> On 04/05/2015 22:08, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > This is v2 of the patch set to improve current mainline support for
> > the Compulab CM-A510 System-on-Module (SoM) and its default Compulab
> > SBC-A510 base board.
> > 
> > Compared to v1 [1] there have been the overall changes:
> > - Drop i2c-mux-pinctrl rework as Wolfram Sang raised concerns with
> >   respect to OF_DYNAMIC. Instead we add i2c-mux-pinctrl node by
> >   default and wait until corresponding driver respects disabled
> >   sub-bus nodes. This will add 3 additional i2c busses to all
> >   Dove based boards, but no functional change with respect to
> >   i2c-0.
> > - Split patches dealing with arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile to route
> >   them though arm-soc directly.
> > 
> > Other patches of v1 have already been taken by MVEBU SoC maintainers
> > as fixes.
> > 
> > Patches are based on v4.1-rc1 and are intended for v4.2. All patches
> > contain appropriate Acked-by's from related maintainers. Patches 3
> > and 5 should go thought arm-soc directly, the rest can go though
> > mvebu tree.
> 
> Usually even the change of the arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile go to
> arm-soc through mvebu. For patch 5 it makes sens because if the series
> is spited then the Makefile could be merged before the new file
> to build.
> 
> So unless, Arnd or Olof really want to pick the patches 3 and 5 I will
> apply the patches 2 to 5 on mvebu/dt.
> 
> Arnd, Olof, do you agree?

Yes, please pick up all the patches and send them to us with your
normal pull requests.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/