linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/gpio/gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 17:09:49 +0200
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-pwm <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Povilas Staniulis <wdmonster@...il.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@...roid-x86.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/gpio/gpiolib: Add support for
 removing registered consumer lookup table

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a
> > lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide
> > an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload
> >
> > v2: Ccing maintainers
> >
> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@...el.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the
same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just
those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems
once it's reviewed. Would that be ok?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/