linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add msm8916 CoreSight components

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 May 2015 21:17:12 +0300
From:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <ivan.ivanov@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Pratik Patel <pratikp@...eaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add msm8916 CoreSight components


> On May 8, 2015, at 9:00 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:47:57PM +0100, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 07:38 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>> On 7 May 2015 at 09:36, Ivan T. Ivanov ivanov@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>> Add initial set of CoreSight components found on Qualcomm's 8x16 chipset.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +       replicator@...000 {
>>>> +               compatible = "qcom,coresight-replicator", "arm,primecell";
>>> 
>>> Shouldn't it be "qcom,coresight-replicator1x" ?
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> True, I still wonder, why we have to have this compatible string? 
>> Drivers are probed by amba_id and "arm,primecell", after all.
> 
> The compatible string tells you both the device _and_ the format of the
> other properties, because it tells you which binding applies.
> 
> So the compatible string should be present regardless, as
> "arm,primecell" does not define the majority of the properties you need
> for the replicator node.

Mmm, only if vendors don’t bother to update version information
fused to revision id registers, which happens. And this could 
be workaround by "arm,primecell-periphid”, no?

Regards,
Ivan--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/