lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 10 May 2015 23:12:51 -0400
From:	Zhihui Zhang <zzhsuny@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Rename RECLAIM_SWAP to RECLAIM_UNMAP.

the name SWAP implies that we are dealing with anonymous pages only.
In fact, the original patch that introduced the min_unmapped_ratio
logic was to fix an issue related to file pages. Rename it to
RECLAIM_UNMAP to match what does.

Historically, commit <a6dc60f8975a> renamed .may_swap to .may_unmap,
leaving RECLAIM_SWAP behind.  commit <2e2e42598908> reintroduced .may_swap
for memory controller.

Signed-off-by: Zhihui Zhang <zzhsuny@...il.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 5e8eadd..15328de 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3596,7 +3596,7 @@ int zone_reclaim_mode __read_mostly;
 #define RECLAIM_OFF 0
 #define RECLAIM_ZONE (1<<0)	/* Run shrink_inactive_list on the zone */
 #define RECLAIM_WRITE (1<<1)	/* Writeout pages during reclaim */
-#define RECLAIM_SWAP (1<<2)	/* Swap pages out during reclaim */
+#define RECLAIM_UNMAP (1<<2)	/* Unmap pages during reclaim */
 
 /*
  * Priority for ZONE_RECLAIM. This determines the fraction of pages
@@ -3638,12 +3638,12 @@ static long zone_pagecache_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
 	long delta = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * If RECLAIM_SWAP is set, then all file pages are considered
+	 * If RECLAIM_UNMAP is set, then all file pages are considered
 	 * potentially reclaimable. Otherwise, we have to worry about
 	 * pages like swapcache and zone_unmapped_file_pages() provides
 	 * a better estimate
 	 */
-	if (zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP)
+	if (zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP)
 		nr_pagecache_reclaimable = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FILE_PAGES);
 	else
 		nr_pagecache_reclaimable = zone_unmapped_file_pages(zone);
@@ -3674,15 +3674,15 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		.order = order,
 		.priority = ZONE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY,
 		.may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
-		.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP),
+		.may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
 		.may_swap = 1,
 	};
 
 	cond_resched();
 	/*
-	 * We need to be able to allocate from the reserves for RECLAIM_SWAP
+	 * We need to be able to allocate from the reserves for RECLAIM_UNMAP
 	 * and we also need to be able to write out pages for RECLAIM_WRITE
-	 * and RECLAIM_SWAP.
+	 * and RECLAIM_UNMAP.
 	 */
 	p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE;
 	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ