linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 May 2015 16:47:39 +0200
From:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:19:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > > If you're looking for me to review something you need to send it to me,
> > > > and the chances of me looking at it are very much increased if there's a
> > > > relevant subject line.  I'm CCed (not even on the to list) on endless
> > > > large threads and reposts of patch serieses about MFD drivers most of
> > > > which are of very little relevance to me so they get ignored very
> > > > easily.
> > 
> > > Calm down dear, it's only a commercial.
> > 
> > > I wasn't having a pop.  Rather empathising with your situation and
> > > facilitating a resend that you're likely to see.
> > 
> > > I'm sure Johan will do the right thing.
> > 
> > My point is that a simple resend has a reasonable chance of getting
> > dropped on the floor.
> 
> As I say, I'm sure Johan will do what's required for that not to
> happen.

Seriously? *Me* do the right thing?

We have a regression in your subsystems (mfd/regulator) with a fix
that's been sitting in both your mailboxes since March 25th.

And now that Mark finally responds to a mail after repeated reminders
from both me and Lee, he still doesn't care enough to look up the
original mail or at least make sure that a resend does not get lost
again.

You two even work for the same organisation. Just pick up the phone or
find a way to get a message across that mail filter instead of wasting
everyone else's time.

I have resent the patch now. Please make sure it gets applied.

Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/