| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 13:57:26 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] max7359_keypad: implement DT bindings
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:38:03AM +0300, Evgeniy Dushistov wrote:
> max7359_keypad: implement DT bindings
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy A. Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/input/max7359-keypad.txt | 33 ++++++++++++
> drivers/input/keyboard/max7359_keypad.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/max7359-keypad.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/max7359-keypad.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/max7359-keypad.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0a3c381
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/max7359-keypad.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +* MAX7359 keypda device tree bindings
> +
> +Required Properties:
> +- compatible: Should be "maxim,max7359"
> +- linux,keymap: The definition can be found at
> + bindings/input/matrix-keymap.txt
> +
> +Optional Properties:
> +- maxim,debounce_reg: u8, in short allow control debounce,
> +see max7359 datasheet for details
> +- maxim,ports_reg: u8, in short allow control what pin used,
> +and what pins should be configured as GPIO
> +
> +Example:
> + max7359_keypad@38 {
> + compatible = "maxim,max7359";
> + reg = <0x38>;
> + interrupts = <28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;/*gpio_156*/
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio5>;
> + maxim,debounce_reg = /bits/ 8 <0x5F>;
> + maxim,ports_reg = /bits/ 8 <0xFF>;
Specifying exact size for properties is quite uncommon; I think the
usual recommendation is is to use the "standard" u32 and validate the
range in parser function.
> + linux,keymap = <
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 0, KEY_RESERVED) /*row 0 not used*/
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 1, KEY_RESERVED)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 2, KEY_RESERVED)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 3, KEY_RESERVED)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 4, KEY_RESERVED)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 5, KEY_RESERVED)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 6, KEY_RESERVED)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0, 7, KEY_RESERVED)
> + ...
Indent one more level? Also, maybe fill with something other than
KEY_RESERVED?
> + >;
> + };
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/max7359_keypad.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/max7359_keypad.c
> index 5091133..0164f2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/max7359_keypad.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/max7359_keypad.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm.h>
> #include <linux/input.h>
> #include <linux/input/matrix_keypad.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> #define MAX7359_MAX_KEY_ROWS 8
> #define MAX7359_MAX_KEY_COLS 8
> @@ -64,6 +65,11 @@ struct max7359_keypad {
> struct i2c_client *client;
> };
>
> +struct max7359_initial_state {
> + u8 debounce_val;
> + u8 ports_val;
> +};
> +
> static int max7359_write_reg(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 val)
> {
> int ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg, val);
> @@ -143,24 +149,54 @@ static void max7359_close(struct input_dev *dev)
> max7359_fall_deepsleep(keypad->client);
> }
>
> -static void max7359_initialize(struct i2c_client *client)
> +static void max7359_initialize(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct max7359_initial_state *init_state)
> {
> max7359_write_reg(client, MAX7359_REG_CONFIG,
> MAX7359_CFG_KEY_RELEASE | /* Key release enable */
> MAX7359_CFG_WAKEUP); /* Key press wakeup enable */
>
> /* Full key-scan functionality */
> - max7359_write_reg(client, MAX7359_REG_DEBOUNCE, 0x1F);
> + max7359_write_reg(client, MAX7359_REG_DEBOUNCE,
> + init_state->debounce_val);
>
> /* nINT asserts every debounce cycles */
> max7359_write_reg(client, MAX7359_REG_INTERRUPT, 0x01);
> + max7359_write_reg(client, MAX7359_REG_PORTS, init_state->ports_val);
>
> max7359_fall_deepsleep(client);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int max7359_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> + struct max7359_initial_state *init_state)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + u8 prop;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_u8(np, "maxim,debounce_reg", &prop))
> + init_state->debounce_val = prop;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_u8(np, "maxim,ports_reg", &prop))
> + init_state->ports_val = prop;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int max7359_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> + struct max7359_initial_state *init_state)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int max7359_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> + struct max7359_initial_state init_state = {
> + .debounce_val = 0x1F,
> + .ports_val = 0xFE,
> + };
> const struct matrix_keymap_data *keymap_data =
> dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> struct max7359_keypad *keypad;
> @@ -181,6 +217,15 @@ static int max7359_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> }
>
> dev_dbg(&client->dev, "keys FIFO is 0x%02x\n", ret);
> + if (!keymap_data) {
> + error = max7359_parse_dt(&client->dev, &init_state);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "platform data null, and no DT data\n");
> + return error;
Both debounce and ports values are optional and we'll fail building
keymap if there are no platform data nor device tree data, so I would
drop this check and the stub for max7359_parse_dt() as well - we have
stubs for property parsing anyway.
> + }
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Init vals: debounce %X, ports %X\n",
> + init_state.debounce_val, init_state.ports_val);
> + }
>
> keypad = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct max7359_keypad),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -239,7 +284,7 @@ static int max7359_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> }
>
> /* Initialize MAX7359 */
> - max7359_initialize(client);
> + max7359_initialize(client, &init_state);
>
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, keypad);
> device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 1);
> @@ -282,10 +327,19 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id max7359_ids[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, max7359_ids);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id max7359_dt_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "maxim,max7359" },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, max7359_dt_match);
> +#endif
> +
> static struct i2c_driver max7359_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "max7359",
> .pm = &max7359_pm,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(max7359_dt_match),
> },
> .probe = max7359_probe,
> .id_table = max7359_ids,
> --
> 2.3.6
>
> --
> /Evgeniy
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists