lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 16 May 2015 00:53:17 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc:	y2038@...ts.linaro.org, baolin.wang@...aro.org,
	albert.aribaud@...ev.fr, john.stultz@...aro.org,
	bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org, ruchandani.tina@...il.com,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] y2038: use __kernel_timespec in sys_futex

On Wed, 6 May 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> Conversion for sys_futex is particularly easy, we can use the unmodified
> compat_sys_futex on 32-bit systems to provide compatibility for 32-bit
> time_t, and change sys_futex to pass a __kernel_timespec, which matches
> what future libc implementations will use as their struct timespec.

Unless I'm missing something I doubt that you get away that easy. It
works on 32bit, but not on 64 bit with 32bit app support:

Native 64bit: 	   sys_futex()
32bit timespec32:  compat_sys_futex()
32bit timespec64:  ?????

You cannot map that to sys_futex() because the pointer size differs.
 
Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ