lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 17 May 2015 15:06:57 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Jens Kuske <jenskuske@...il.com>
Cc:	Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] clk: sunxi: Let divs clocks read the base
 factor clock name from devicetree

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 06:38:53PM +0200, Jens Kuske wrote:
> Currently, the sunxi clock driver gets the name for the base factor clock
> of divs clocks from the name field in factors_data. This prevents reusing
> of the factor clock for clocks with same properties, but different name.
> 
> This commit makes the divs setup function try to get a name from
> clock-output-names in the devicetree. It also removes the name field where
> possible and merges the sun4i PLL5 and PLL6 clocks.
> 
> The sun4i PLL5 clock doesn't have a output for the base factor clock,
> so we still have to use the name field there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Kuske <jenskuske@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> index 17cba4d..afe560c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> @@ -708,18 +708,10 @@ static const struct factors_data sun4i_pll5_data __initconst = {
>  	.name = "pll5",
>  };
>  
> -static const struct factors_data sun4i_pll6_data __initconst = {
> -	.enable = 31,
> -	.table = &sun4i_pll5_config,
> -	.getter = sun4i_get_pll5_factors,
> -	.name = "pll6",
> -};
> -
>  static const struct factors_data sun6i_a31_pll6_data __initconst = {
>  	.enable = 31,
>  	.table = &sun6i_a31_pll6_config,
>  	.getter = sun6i_a31_get_pll6_factors,
> -	.name = "pll6x2",
>  };
>  
>  static const struct factors_data sun5i_a13_ahb_data __initconst = {
> @@ -1099,7 +1091,7 @@ static const struct divs_data pll5_divs_data __initconst = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct divs_data pll6_divs_data __initconst = {
> -	.factors = &sun4i_pll6_data,
> +	.factors = &sun4i_pll5_data,
>  	.ndivs = 4,
>  	.div = {
>  		{ .shift = 0, .table = pll6_sata_tbl, .gate = 14 }, /* M, SATA */
> @@ -1141,6 +1133,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>  	struct clk_gate *gate = NULL;
>  	struct clk_fixed_factor *fix_factor;
>  	struct clk_divider *divider;
> +	struct factors_data factors = *data->factors;
>  	void __iomem *reg;
>  	int ndivs = SUNXI_DIVS_MAX_QTY, i = 0;
>  	int flags, clkflags;
> @@ -1149,8 +1142,17 @@ static void __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>  	if (data->ndivs)
>  		ndivs = data->ndivs;
>  
> +	/* Try to find a name for base factor clock */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ndivs; i++) {
> +		if (data->div[i].self) {

I'm not sure we should expect the factor clock to have a self factor.

what about taking the first output and taking the substring up to the
first "_" ?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ