lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 23:25:30 +0300
From:	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
Subject: [BUG] iscsi-target: deadlock because of iscsit_get_tpg()

Hello,

Our tool reports a potential double lock because of quite strange code
in iscsit_get_tpg().

drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_tpg.c:
int iscsit_get_tpg(
	struct iscsi_portal_group *tpg)
{
	int ret;

	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&tpg->tpg_access_lock);
	return ((ret != 0) || signal_pending(current)) ? -1 : 0;
}

If mutex_lock_interruptible() successfully acquires the mutex, but there
is a pending signal, the function returns error, but it leaves the mutex
held. Callers do not expect such behaviour that can lead to a deadlock.

Why the check for pending signal is needed here?

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).


Similar dangerous pattern presents in a couple of other places:

drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c:
int iscsit_access_np(struct iscsi_np *np, struct iscsi_portal_group *tpg)
{
...
	ret = down_interruptible(&tpg->np_login_sem);
	if ((ret != 0) || signal_pending(current))
		return -1;


drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c:
static sense_reason_t
sbc_compare_and_write(struct se_cmd *cmd)
{
...
	rc = down_interruptible(&dev->caw_sem);
	if ((rc != 0) || signal_pending(current)) {
		cmd->transport_complete_callback = NULL;
		return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
	}


--
Alexey Khoroshilov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ