lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 16:49:35 +0800
From:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, vgandhi@...eaurora.org,
	wim@...ana.be, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	"mark.rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in foundation-v8.dts

Hi Arnd,

yes, you are right , will delete it :-)

On 21 May 2015 at 16:45, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 May 2015 16:32:32 fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
>> +       watchdog0: watchdog@...50000 {
>> +               compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt";
>> +               reg = <0x0 0x2a450000 0 0x10000>,
>> +                       <0x0 0x2a440000 0 0x10000>;
>> +               reg-names = "refresh",
>> +                       "control";
>> +               interrupts = <0 27 4>;
>> +               interrupt-names = "ws0";
>> +               timeout-sec = <10 5>;
>> +       };
>>  };
>>
>
> just one tiny comment: you can drop the 'watchdog0:' label here, there
> is normally no reason to assign a label to a watchdog device, especially
> if it's in a .dts file rather than a .dtsi.
>
> The same is true for the example in the binding documentation.
>
>         Arnd



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ