| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:10:16 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Kevin Tsai <ktsai@...ellamicro.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
Roberta Dobrescu <roberta.dobrescu@...il.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
CC: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] iio: light: Updated Vishay Capella cm32181 ambient
light sensor driver.
On 22/05/15 05:19, Kevin Tsai wrote:
> - Replaced als_it_bits and als_it_value by cm32181_als_it_scale.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Tsai <ktsai@...ellamicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c b/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c
> index 9bc3e1f..54bf0cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c
> @@ -53,12 +53,25 @@
> #define CM32181_MLUX_PER_BIT_BASE_IT 800000 /* Based on IT=800ms */
> #define CM32181_CALIBSCALE_DEFAULT 1000
> #define CM32181_CALIBSCALE_RESOLUTION 1000
> -#define MLUX_PER_LUX 1000
> +#define CM32181_MLUX_PER_LUX 1000
Hmm. I'd just drop this and put it inline as it's obvious and in capitals
M would be mega ;)
>
> static const int als_it_bits[] = {12, 8, 0, 1, 2, 3};
> static const int als_it_value[] = {25000, 50000, 100000, 200000, 400000,
> 800000};
>
> +static const struct {
> + int val;
> + int val2;
> + u16 it;
> +} cm32181_als_it_scales[] = {
> + {0, 25000, 12}, /* 0.025000 */
> + {0, 50000, 8}, /* 0.050000 */
> + {0, 100000, 0}, /* 0.100000 */
> + {0, 200000, 1}, /* 0.200000 */
> + {0, 400000, 2}, /* 0.400000 */
> + {0, 800000, 3}, /* 0.800000 */
> +};
If all val values are 0, why store them here?
Or is this likely to change shortly?
> +
> struct cm32181_als_info {
> u8 hw_id;
> u16 reg_cmd;
> @@ -129,15 +142,16 @@ static int cm32181_reg_init(struct cm32181_chip *chip)
> }
>
> /**
> - * cm32181_read_als_it() - Get sensor integration time (ms)
> + * cm32181_read_als_it() - Get sensor integration time
> * @chip: pointer of struct cm32181_chip
> - * @val2: pointer of int to load the als_it value.
> + * @val: pointer of int to load the integration (sec)
> + * @val2: pointer of int to load the integration time (microsecond)
> *
> * Report the current integartion time by millisecond.
> *
> * Return: IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO for success, otherwise -EINVAL.
> */
> -static int cm32181_read_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int *val2)
> +static int cm32181_read_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int *val, int *val2)
> {
Adding val in here adds a lot of churn and no benefit currently...
> u16 als_it;
> int i;
> @@ -145,9 +159,10 @@ static int cm32181_read_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int *val2)
> als_it = chip->conf_regs[CM32181_REG_ADDR_CMD];
> als_it &= CM32181_CMD_ALS_IT_MASK;
> als_it >>= CM32181_CMD_ALS_IT_SHIFT;
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(als_it_bits); i++) {
> - if (als_it == als_it_bits[i]) {
> - *val2 = als_it_value[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cm32181_als_it_scales); i++) {
> + if (als_it == cm32181_als_it_scales[i].it) {
> + *val = cm32181_als_it_scales[i].val;
> + *val2 = cm32181_als_it_scales[i].val2;
> return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> }
> }
> @@ -158,15 +173,44 @@ static int cm32181_read_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int *val2)
> /**
> * cm32181_write_als_it() - Write sensor integration time
> * @chip: pointer of struct cm32181_chip.
> - * @val: integration time by millisecond.
> + * @val: integration time in second.
> + * @val2: integration time in microsecond.
> *
> * Convert integration time (ms) to sensor value.
> *
> * Return: i2c_smbus_write_word_data command return value.
> */
> -static int cm32181_write_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int val)
> +static int cm32181_write_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int val, int val2)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = chip->client;
> + u16 als_it, cmd;
> + int i;
> + s32 ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cm32181_als_it_scales); i++) {
> + if (val == cm32181_als_it_scales[i].val &&
> + val2 == cm32181_als_it_scales[i].val2) {
> +
> + als_it = cm32181_als_it_scales[i].it;
> + als_it <<= CM32181_CMD_ALS_IT_SHIFT;
> +
> + cmd = chip->conf_regs[CM32181_REG_ADDR_CMD];
> + cmd &= ~CM32181_CMD_ALS_IT_MASK;
> + cmd |= als_it;
> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(client,
> + CM32181_REG_ADDR_CMD,
> + cmd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + chip->conf_regs[CM32181_REG_ADDR_CMD] = cmd;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> +/*
Umm. This comments out a load of dead code. Please don't do this in a patch!
(I nearly missed it) Basically this smacks of the fact you didn't clean up
your patches properly before submitting them as this would be really obvious
in the code after applying them!
> + struct i2c_client *client = chip->client;
> u16 als_it;
> int ret, i, n;
>
> @@ -190,6 +234,7 @@ static int cm32181_write_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int val)
> mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
>
> return ret;
> +*/
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -204,26 +249,29 @@ static int cm32181_write_als_it(struct cm32181_chip *chip, int val)
> static int cm32181_get_lux(struct cm32181_chip *chip)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = chip->client;
> + struct cm32181_als_info *als_info = chip->als_info;
> int ret;
> + int val, val2;
> int als_it;
> - unsigned long lux;
> + u64 lux;
>
> - ret = cm32181_read_als_it(chip, &als_it);
> + ret = cm32181_read_als_it(chip, &val, &val2);
> if (ret < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> + als_it = val * 1000000 + val2;
>
> - lux = CM32181_MLUX_PER_BIT;
> - lux *= CM32181_MLUX_PER_BIT_BASE_IT;
> - lux /= als_it;
> + lux = (__force u64)als_info->mlux_per_bit;
Is the __force necessary? If so then a comment to eplain why!
> + lux *= als_info->mlux_per_bit_base_it;
> + lux = div_u64(lux, als_it);
>
> ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, CM32181_REG_ADDR_ALS);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> lux *= ret;
> - lux *= chip->als_info->calibscale;
> - lux /= CM32181_CALIBSCALE_RESOLUTION;
> - lux /= MLUX_PER_LUX;
> + lux *= als_info->calibscale;
> + lux = div_u64(lux, CM32181_CALIBSCALE_RESOLUTION);
> + lux = div_u64(lux, CM32181_MLUX_PER_LUX);
>
> if (lux > 0xFFFF)
> lux = 0xFFFF;
> @@ -250,7 +298,7 @@ static int cm32181_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
> *val = 0;
> - ret = cm32181_read_als_it(chip, val2);
> + ret = cm32181_read_als_it(chip, val, val2);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -269,7 +317,7 @@ static int cm32181_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> chip->als_info->calibscale = val;
> return val;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
> - ret = cm32181_write_als_it(chip, val2);
> + ret = cm32181_write_als_it(chip, val, val2);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -289,12 +337,21 @@ static int cm32181_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> static ssize_t cm32181_get_it_available(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> + int i, len;
> +
> + for (i = 0, len = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cm32181_als_it_scales); i++)
> + len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%u.%06u ",
> + cm32181_als_it_scales[i].val,
> + cm32181_als_it_scales[i].val2);
> + return len + scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "\n");
> +/*
> int i, n, len;
>
> n = ARRAY_SIZE(als_it_value);
> for (i = 0, len = 0; i < n; i++)
> len += sprintf(buf + len, "0.%06u ", als_it_value[i]);
> return len + sprintf(buf + len, "\n");
> +*/
> }
>
> static const struct iio_chan_spec cm32181_channels[] = {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists