lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 24 May 2015 21:34:04 +0200
From:	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org, ebru.akagunduz@...il.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, riel@...hat.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
	zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG] Read-Only THP causes stalls (commit 10359213d)

Hi all,

I noticed a regression on my arm64 APM X-Gene system a couple
of weeks back.  I would occassionally see the system lock up and see RCU
stalls during the caching phase of kernbench.  I then wrote a small
script that does nothing but cache the files
(http://paste.ubuntu.com/11324767/) and ran that in a loop.  On a known
bad commit (v4.1-rc2), out of 25 boots, I never saw it get past 21
iterations of the loop.  I have since tried to run a bisect from v3.19 to
v4.0 using 100 iterations as my criteria for a good commit.

This resulted in the following first bad commit:

10359213d05acf804558bda7cc9b8422a828d1cd
(mm: incorporate read-only pages into transparent huge pages, 2015-02-11)

Indeed, running the workload on v4.1-rc4 still produced the behavior,
but reverting the above commit gets me through 100 iterations of the
loop.

I have not tried to reproduce on an x86 system.  Turning on a bunch
of kernel debugging features *seems* to hide the problem.  My config for
the XGene system is defconfig + CONFIG_BRIDGE and
CONFIG_POWER_RESET_XGENE.

Please let me know if I can help test patches or other things I can
do to help.  I'm afraid that by simply reading the patch I didn't see
anything obviously wrong with it which would cause this behavior.

Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ