linux-kernel - Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 May 2015 19:22:39 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, David Lang <david@...g.hm>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tux3@...3.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes

On (05/26/15 01:08), Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 12:09:10 AM PDT, Jan Kara wrote:
> >  E.g. video drivers (or infiniband or direct IO for that matter) which
> >have buffers in user memory (may be mmapped file), grab references to pages
> >and hand out PFNs of those pages to the hardware to store data in them...
> >If you fork a page after the driver has handed PFNs to the hardware, you've
> >just lost all the writes hardware will do.
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> The page forked because somebody wrote to it with write(2) or mmap write at
> the same time as a video driver (or infiniband or direct IO) was doing io to
> it. Isn't the application trying hard to lose data in that case? It would
> not need page fork to lose data that way.
> 

Hello,

is it possible to page-fork-bomb the system by some 'malicious' app?

	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/