linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 May 2015 09:19:41 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module_address()

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:37:17AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> That's rcu_read_lock_sched_held, not rcu_held_lock_sched_held().
>> 
>> Also, your unlikely is weird and backwards.
>> 
>> I changed it as below, and folded.  It's in modules-next.
>> 
>> I'm now going to do some *actual* testing, and I'll go all Torvalds on
>> you if this spews warnings...
>
> Fair enough, I did see the build robot fail on this. How come those only
> showed up now? This patch has been in your git tree for a long time; you
> picked up the rcu validation patches before the other ones.

Indeed...

Fengguang, is the kbuild test robot checking my pending-rebases tree?
It's probably going to produce some noise (since that's where I drop
unreviewed patches, too), but that's OK.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/