lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:36:13 -0700 From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> To: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: brcmstb-gpio: document properties for wakeup On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 07:14:07PM -0700, Gregory Fong wrote: > Some brcmstb GPIO controllers can be used to wake from suspend, so use the > de facto standard property 'wakeup-source' to mark the nodes of controllers > with that capability. > > Also document interrupts-extended, which will be used for wakeup handling > because the interrupt parent for the wake IRQ is different from the regular > IRQ. > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com> > --- > New in v2. > > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/brcm,brcmstb-gpio.txt | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/brcm,brcmstb-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/brcm,brcmstb-gpio.txt > index 435f1bc..568814f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/brcm,brcmstb-gpio.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/brcm,brcmstb-gpio.txt > @@ -33,6 +33,12 @@ Optional properties: > - interrupt-parent: > phandle of the parent interrupt controller > > +- interrupts-extended: > + Alternate form of specifying interrupts and parents that allows for > + multiple parents. This takes precedence over 'interrupts' and > + 'interrupt-parent'. This probably must be used if the wakeup-source > + property is provided because that may have a different interrupt parent. > + "This probably must be used" seems a little awkward, especially when you're just explaining an implementation detail of our SoCs, rather than something unique about this binding. Maybe: "Wakeup-capable GPIO controllers often route their wakeup interrupt lines through a different interrupt controller than the primary interrupt line, making this property necessary." > - #interrupt-cells: > Should be <2>. The first cell is the GPIO number, the second should specify > flags. The following subset of flags is supported: > @@ -48,7 +54,10 @@ Optional properties: > Marks the device node as an interrupt controller > > - interrupt-names: > - The name of the IRQ resource used by this controller > + The names of the IRQ resources used by this controller If you're specifying names, you should list them here. > + > +- wakeup-source: > + GPIOs for this controller can be used as a wakeup source > > Example: > upg_gio: gpio@...0a700 { > @@ -63,3 +72,18 @@ Example: > interrupt-names = "upg_gio"; > brcm,gpio-bank-widths = <0x20 0x20 0x20 0x18>; > }; > + > + upg_gio_aon: gpio@...172c0 { > + #gpio-cells = <0x2>; > + #interrupt-cells = <0x2>; Might use decimal instead of hex for the above 2 lines? > + compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-gpio", "brcm,brcmstb-gpio"; > + gpio-controller; > + interrupt-controller; > + reg = <0xf04172c0 0x40>; > + interrupt-parent = <0xc>; That should be a phandle, not an int (I realize phandles resolve down to an integer, but we're speaking DTS, not DTB). > + interrupts = <0x6>; > + interrupts-extended = <0xc 0x6 0xa 0x5>; Same here (phandles). Also, even though the interrupt binding semantics specify precedence between interrupts and interrupts-extended, I'd think an example should stick to one or the other, no? > + interrupt-names = "upg_gio_aon", "upg_gio_aon_wakeup"; > + wakeup-source; > + brcm,gpio-bank-widths = <0x12 0x4>; > + }; Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists