lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:53:32 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc:	tomi.valkeinen@...com, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/17] video: fbdev: gbefb: use arch_phys_wc_add() and
 devm_ioremap_wc()


* Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:41:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > +		gbe_mem = devm_ioremap_wc(&p_dev->dev, gbe_mem_phys,
> > > +					  gbe_mem_size);
> > 
> > > +		gbe_mem = dma_alloc_writecombine(NULL, gbe_mem_size,
> > > +						 &gbe_dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > > +	par->wc_cookie = arch_phys_wc_add(gbe_mem_phys, gbe_mem_size);
> > 
> > > +	arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie);
> > 
> > > +	arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie);
> > 
> > Could we _please_ rename dma_*_writecombine() to dma_*_wc(), so that the naming is 
> > coherent across the various APIs?
> 
> Sure, OK done. Will send once this series is merged and visible on linux-next. 
> But who's tree should this go through? Since it depends on this series which 
> goes through Tomi's tree should it go through there?

So we could do the rename near the end of the merge window, when all the patches 
have drained from maintainer trees into Linus's tree. Mind keeping it in your tree 
until then?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ