linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 07/24] x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use arch_nvram_ops methods instead of nvram_read_byte() and nvram_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:34:01 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/24] x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use arch_nvram_ops methods
 instead of nvram_read_byte() and nvram_write_byte()

On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:09:28AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Test results were sent to me privately, and they are correct, so...
> 

Finn, unless there is some compelling reason not to - like they are MBs worth of
data, please submit these to the list in the future so we have them for
reference.

> Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>

I'm fine with the changes, but they need to be submitted with the other changes
as this one change cannot compile independently in my tree.

Finn, please work with whomever is pulling the series to include this in their
pull request.

Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/