linux-kernel - Re: randconfig build error with next-20150603, in fs/xfs/xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2015 23:15:58 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
CC:	Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: randconfig build error with next-20150603, in fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c

[Re: randconfig build error with next-20150603, in fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c] On 04/06/2015 (Thu 13:01) Dave Chinner wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:36:54PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Building with the attached random configuration file,
> > >
> > > fs/built-in.o: In function `xfs_ifree_cluster':
> > > /home/jim/linux/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:2268: undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
> > 
> > I don't think this is specific to a particular randconfig.
> > 
> > On ARM allmodconfig, I saw:
> > 
> > ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/xfs/xfs.ko] undefined!
> > 
> > On powerpc with an older gcc-4.5 toolchain, I saw:
> > 
> > /bin/sh: line 1: 23453 Segmentation fault      powerpc-linux-ld -EB -m
> > elf64ppc -r -T /home/paul/git/linux-head/scripts/module-common.lds
> > arch/powerpc/lib/crtsavres.o --build-id -o fs/xfs/xfs.ko fs/xfs/xfs.o
> > fs/xfs/xfs.mod.o
> > make[2]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs.ko] Error 139
> > 
> > I have not investigated further than that.
> 
> A fix is already pending. Probably be in tomorrow's linux-next
> build.

Thanks Dave -- sounds good.  After all, the whole point of linux-next is
to spot these and vet out arch/merge issues before they get merged.

No matter what level of arch and config coverage I try to do, it seems
linux-next still finds a corner case that I somehow missed.

Hopefully we don't lose sight of that underlying goal and we don't
inadvertently intimidate folks from requesting their changes to be added
to linux-next.

Paul.
--

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/