linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/10] x86/intel_cqm: Modify hot cpu notification handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu,  4 Jun 2015 17:01:29 -0700
From:	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	vikas.shivappa@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, matt.fleming@...el.com, will.auld@...el.com,
	kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com, vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] x86/intel_cqm: Modify hot cpu notification handling

This patch modifies hot cpu notification handling in Intel cache
monitoring:

 - to add a new cpu to the cqm_cpumask(which has one cpu per package)
  during cpu start, it uses the existing package<->core map instead of
  looping through all cpus in cqm_cpumask.
 - to search for the next online sibling during cpu exit, it uses the
 cpumask_any_online_but instead of looping through all online cpus.  In
 large systems with large number of cpus the time taken to loop may be
 expensive and also the time increase linearly.

Signed-off-by: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
index 1880761..b224142 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
@@ -1236,15 +1236,15 @@ static struct pmu intel_cqm_pmu = {
 
 static inline void cqm_pick_event_reader(int cpu)
 {
-	int phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
-	int i;
+	struct cpumask tmp;
 
-	for_each_cpu(i, &cqm_cpumask) {
-		if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i))
-			return;	/* already got reader for this socket */
-	}
+	cpumask_and(&tmp, &cqm_cpumask, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
 
-	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cqm_cpumask);
+	/*
+	 * Pick a reader if there isn't one already.
+	 */
+	if (cpumask_empty(&tmp))
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cqm_cpumask);
 }
 
 static void intel_cqm_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -1262,7 +1262,6 @@ static void intel_cqm_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static void intel_cqm_cpu_exit(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	int phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
 	int i;
 
 	/*
@@ -1271,15 +1270,9 @@ static void intel_cqm_cpu_exit(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cqm_cpumask))
 		return;
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
-		if (i == cpu)
-			continue;
-
-		if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i)) {
-			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cqm_cpumask);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	i = cpumask_any_online_but(topology_core_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+	if (i < nr_cpu_ids)
+		cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cqm_cpumask);
 }
 
 static int intel_cqm_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/