| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:33:00 -0700 From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>, Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...roid.com>, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Android style loosening of cgroup attach permissions On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:11:17AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote: >> > memcg usage came up a while ago and there wasn't anything major which >> > can't be achieved (usually better) by following more standard cgroup >> > usage - changing knobs rather than moving tasks around. >> >> Do you have a pointer to that discussion or maybe even just a sense of >> who was involved so I can trawl the list and better understand it? > > I wrote a lengthy explanation of why moving tasks between cgroups is > problematic from a memcg view: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/19/358 And many thanks for the discussion pointer here! Its very enlightening! thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists