[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150607225638.GA9329@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 00:56:38 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, ktkhai@...allels.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...il.com,
pang.xunlei@...aro.org, wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] hrtimer: Allow hrtimer::function() to free the
timer
On 06/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> And I simply can not understand the complication in hrtimer_active(),
> please help!
Sorry for another off-topic email, but I don't even understand the
usage of hrtimer_active().
Say, do_nanosleep()
hrtimer_start_expires(&t->timer, mode);
if (!hrtimer_active(&t->timer))
t->task = NULL;
why? Assuming that hrtimer_active() is correct, it can only return
false if t->task was already cleared by hrtimer_wakeup().
OTOH. perf_cpu_hrtimer_restart() does
if (hrtimer_active(hr))
return;
if (!hrtimer_callback_running(hr))
__hrtimer_start_range_ns(...);
why it can't simply do
if (!hrtimer_active(hr)) // implies !hrtimer_callback_running()
__hrtimer_start_range_ns(...);
Confused.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists