lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:29:10 +0800
From:	Amos Jianjun Kong <kongjianjun@...il.com>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tobias Diedrich <tobiasdiedrich@...il.com>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio / ACPI: Return -EPROBE_DEFER if the gpiochip was not found

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> If a driver requests a GPIO described in its _CRS but the GPIO host
> controller (gpiochip) driver providing the GPIO has not been loaded yet
> acpi_get_gpiod() returns -ENODEV which causes the calling driver to fail.
>
> If the gpiochip driver is loaded afterwards the driver requesting the GPIO
> will not notice this.
>
> Better approach is to return -EPROBE_DEFER in such case. Then when the
> gpiochip driver appears the driver requesting the GPIO will be probed
> again. This also aligns ACPI GPIO lookup code closer to DT as it does
> pretty much the same when no gpiochip driver was found.
>
> Reported-by: Tobias Diedrich <tobiasdiedrich@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> index 19b99d0c2bf0..b49006c81a7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> @@ -114,10 +114,11 @@ static inline int acpi_gpiochip_pin_to_gpio_offset(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>   * @path:      ACPI GPIO controller full path name, (e.g. "\\_SB.GPO1")
>   * @pin:       ACPI GPIO pin number (0-based, controller-relative)
>   *
> - * Returns GPIO descriptor to use with Linux generic GPIO API, or ERR_PTR
> - * error value
> + * Return: GPIO descriptor to use with Linux generic GPIO API, or ERR_PTR
> + * error value. Specifically returns %-EPROBE_DEFER if the referenced GPIO
> + * controller does not have gpiochip registered at the moment. This is to
> + * support probe deferral.
>   */
> -

api_get_gpiod() is called in preprobe stage, we still have chance to
probe the device.

Reviewed-by: Amos Kong <kongjianjun@...il.com>

>  static struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod(char *path, int pin)
>  {
>         struct gpio_chip *chip;
> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod(char *path, int pin)
>
>         chip = gpiochip_find(handle, acpi_gpiochip_find);
>         if (!chip)
> -               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +               return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>
>         offset = acpi_gpiochip_pin_to_gpio_offset(chip, pin);
>         if (offset < 0)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists