lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:55:07 +0100
From:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:	Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
	Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@...escale.com>,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Jayachandran C <jchandra@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2] PCI: move pci_read_bridge_bases to the
 generic PCI layer

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 08:53:46PM +0100, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> For ARM64 PROBE_ONLY and non-PROBE_ONLY modes:
> 
> Reviewed and Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
> <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>

Thank you !

> Please see minor comments below.

[...]

> > +static void pci_claim_bridge_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > +     struct pci_dev *dev = bus->self;
> > +     int idx;
> > +
> > +     for (idx = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; idx < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; idx++) {
> > +             struct resource *r = &dev->resource[idx];
> > +
> > +             if (!r->flags || r->parent)
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> > +             pci_claim_bridge_resource(dev, idx);
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Nitpicking: Since pci_claim_bridge_resources() is small, and only called
> once from pci_read_brdige_bases(), should we just put the loop inside
> the function?

I think it is ok to add a function for it, I am not fussed either
way I am more concerned by testing the patch on archs I do not have
access to.

Thank you,
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ