| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:08:30 -0700
From: "santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, ssantosh@...nel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, d.walter@...0.at,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ddr: Use less generic identifiers
On 6/20/15 1:46 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 04.05.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> Am 04.01.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>>> At least on UML this identifiers clash with register names.
>>> Use something less generic than Rx, Cx and Cx.
>>>
>>> CC lib//jedec_ddr_data.o
>>> In file included from ./arch/um/include/asm/ptrace-generic.h:11:0,
>>> from ./arch/x86/um/asm/ptrace.h:8,
>>> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:8,
>>> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:16,
>>> from include/linux/bitops.h:36,
>>> from include/linux/kernel.h:10,
>>> from include/linux/list.h:8,
>>> from include/linux/module.h:9,
>>> from lib//jedec_ddr_data.c:14:
>>> ./arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace-abi.h:28:0: warning: "R15" redefined [enabled by default]
>>> #define R15 0
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>>> ---
>>> Please note that this patch is untested.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> //richard
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memory/emif.c | 4 ++--
>>> include/memory/jedec_ddr.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>> lib/jedec_ddr_data.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/emif.c b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> index 04644e7..e0aa09f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/emif.c
>>> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static u32 get_sdram_tim_1_shdw(const struct lpddr2_timings *timings,
>>> val = max(min_tck->tWTR, DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWTR, t_ck)) - 1;
>>> tim1 |= val << T_WTR_SHIFT;
>>>
>>> - if (addressing->num_banks == B8)
>>> + if (addressing->num_banks == DDR_BANK_8)
>>> val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tFAW, t_ck*4);
>>> else
>>> val = max(min_tck->tRRD, DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRRD, t_ck));
>>> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static u32 get_sdram_tim_1_shdw_derated(const struct lpddr2_timings *timings,
>>> * tFAW is approximately 4 times tRRD. So add 1875*4 = 7500ps
>>> * to tFAW for de-rating
>>> */
>>> - if (addressing->num_banks == B8) {
>>> + if (addressing->num_banks == DDR_BANK_8) {
>>> val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tFAW + 7500, 4 * t_ck) - 1;
>>> } else {
>>> val = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRRD + 1875, t_ck);
>>> diff --git a/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h b/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> index ddad0f8..39144d0 100644
>>> --- a/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> +++ b/include/memory/jedec_ddr.h
>>> @@ -40,28 +40,28 @@
>>> #define DDR_IO_WIDTH_32 4
>>>
>>> /* Number of Row bits */
>>> -#define R9 9
>>> -#define R10 10
>>> -#define R11 11
>>> -#define R12 12
>>> -#define R13 13
>>> -#define R14 14
>>> -#define R15 15
>>> -#define R16 16
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_9 9
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_10 10
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_11 11
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_12 12
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_13 13
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_14 14
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_15 15
>>> +#define DDR_ROW_16 16
>>>
>>> /* Number of Column bits */
>>> -#define C7 7
>>> -#define C8 8
>>> -#define C9 9
>>> -#define C10 10
>>> -#define C11 11
>>> -#define C12 12
>>> +#define DDR_COL_7 7
>>> +#define DDR_COL_8 8
>>> +#define DDR_COL_9 9
>>> +#define DDR_COL_10 10
>>> +#define DDR_COL_11 11
>>> +#define DDR_COL_12 12
>>>
>>> /* Number of Banks */
>>> -#define B1 0
>>> -#define B2 1
>>> -#define B4 2
>>> -#define B8 3
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_1 0
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_2 1
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_4 2
>>> +#define DDR_BANK_8 3
>>>
>>> /* Refresh rate in nano-seconds */
>>> #define T_REFI_15_6 15600
>>> diff --git a/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c b/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> index 6d2cbf1..2181be4 100644
>>> --- a/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> +++ b/lib/jedec_ddr_data.c
>>> @@ -16,16 +16,16 @@
>>> /* LPDDR2 addressing details from JESD209-2 section 2.4 */
>>> const struct lpddr2_addressing
>>> lpddr2_jedec_addressing_table[NUM_DDR_ADDR_TABLE_ENTRIES] = {
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 64M */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 128M */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 256M */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 512M */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS4 */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS4 */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 4G */
>>> - {B8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_210}, /* 8G */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS2 */
>>> - {B4, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS2 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 64M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_15_6, T_RFC_90}, /* 128M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 256M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_90}, /* 512M */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS4 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS4 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 4G */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_8, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_210}, /* 8G */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_7_8, T_RFC_130}, /* 1GS2 */
>>> + {DDR_BANK_4, T_REFI_3_9, T_RFC_130}, /* 2GS2 */
>>> };
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lpddr2_jedec_addressing_table);
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>
> *ping -f*
>
Really sorry about that. mMail got lost into filters.
Change looks fine for me.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists