linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] fs: optimize inotify/fsnotify code for unwatched files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:39:11 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	jack@...e.cz, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, eparis@...hat.com,
	john@...nmccutchan.com, rlove@...ve.org,
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fs: optimize inotify/fsnotify code for unwatched
 files

On 06/19/2015 04:33 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > I *think* we can avoid taking the srcu_read_lock() for the
>> > common case where there are no actual marks on the file
>> > being modified *or* the vfsmount.
> What is so expensive in it? Just the memory barrier in it?

The profiling doesn't hit on the mfence directly, but I assume that the
overhead is coming from there.  The "mov    0x8(%rdi),%rcx" is identical
before and after the barrier, but it appears much more expensive
_after_.  That makes no sense unless the barrier is the thing causing it.

Here's how the annotation mode of 'perf top' breaks it down:

>        │    ffffffff810fb480 <load0>:
>        │      nop
>        │      mov    (%rdi),%rax
>   0.58 │      push   %rbp
>        │      incl   %gs:0x7ef0f488(%rip)
>   1.73 │      mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        │      and    $0x1,%eax
>        │      movslq %eax,%rdx
>   0.58 │      mov    0x8(%rdi),%rcx
>        │      incq   %gs:(%rcx,%rdx,8)
>        │      mfence
>  69.94 │      add    $0x2,%rdx
>   7.51 │      mov    0x8(%rdi),%rcx
>   4.05 │      incq   %gs:(%rcx,%rdx,8)
>  13.87 │      decl   %gs:0x7ef0f45f(%rip)
>        │      pop    %rbp
>   1.73 │    ← retq
>                                                          

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/