lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:45 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: acpi: Rename of_node() and acpi_node() to to_of_node() and to_acpi_node()

On Monday, June 22, 2015 10:38:53 PM Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Commit 8a0662d9 introduced of_node and acpi_node symbols in global namespace
> but there were already ~63 of_node local variables or function parameters
> (no single acpi_node though, but anyway).
> 
> After debugging undefined but used of_node local varible (which turned out
> to reference static function of_node() instead) it became clear that the names
> for the functions are too short and too generic for global scope.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>

Putting the whole world into the To: field of your messages is not a good idea
in general.

I'm fine with this change, personally.

Does anyone in the CC list have any objections?


> ---
> 
> Compile-tested on x86_64 with ACPI and ARM with OF.
> 
>  drivers/base/property.c  | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c   |  4 ++--
>  drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c |  2 +-
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h  |  2 +-
>  include/linux/acpi.h     |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/of.h       |  4 ++--
>  6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> index 1d0b116..dfd4de6 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> @@ -128,9 +128,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_property_present);
>  bool fwnode_property_present(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *propname)
>  {
>  	if (is_of_node(fwnode))
> -		return of_property_read_bool(of_node(fwnode), propname);
> +		return of_property_read_bool(to_of_node(fwnode), propname);
>  	else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
> -		return !acpi_dev_prop_get(acpi_node(fwnode), propname, NULL);
> +		return !acpi_dev_prop_get(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname, NULL);
> 
>  	return !!pset_prop_get(to_pset(fwnode), propname);
>  }
> @@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_property_read_string);
>  ({ \
>  	int _ret_; \
>  	if (is_of_node(_fwnode_)) \
> -		_ret_ = OF_DEV_PROP_READ_ARRAY(of_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> +		_ret_ = OF_DEV_PROP_READ_ARRAY(to_of_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
>  					       _type_, _val_, _nval_); \
>  	else if (is_acpi_node(_fwnode_)) \
> -		_ret_ = acpi_dev_prop_read(acpi_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> +		_ret_ = acpi_dev_prop_read(to_acpi_node(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
>  					   _proptype_, _val_, _nval_); \
>  	else \
>  		_ret_ = pset_prop_read_array(to_pset(_fwnode_), _propname_, \
> @@ -424,11 +424,11 @@ int fwnode_property_read_string_array(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  {
>  	if (is_of_node(fwnode))
>  		return val ?
> -			of_property_read_string_array(of_node(fwnode), propname,
> -						      val, nval) :
> -			of_property_count_strings(of_node(fwnode), propname);
> +			of_property_read_string_array(to_of_node(fwnode),
> +						      propname, val, nval) :
> +			of_property_count_strings(to_of_node(fwnode), propname);
>  	else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
> -		return acpi_dev_prop_read(acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
> +		return acpi_dev_prop_read(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
>  					  DEV_PROP_STRING, val, nval);
> 
>  	return pset_prop_read_array(to_pset(fwnode), propname,
> @@ -455,9 +455,9 @@ int fwnode_property_read_string(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  				const char *propname, const char **val)
>  {
>  	if (is_of_node(fwnode))
> -		return of_property_read_string(of_node(fwnode), propname, val);
> +		return of_property_read_string(to_of_node(fwnode), propname, val);
>  	else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
> -		return acpi_dev_prop_read(acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
> +		return acpi_dev_prop_read(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname,
>  					  DEV_PROP_STRING, val, 1);
> 
>  	return -ENXIO;
> @@ -475,13 +475,13 @@ struct fwnode_handle *device_get_next_child_node(struct device *dev,
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
>  		struct device_node *node;
> 
> -		node = of_get_next_available_child(dev->of_node, of_node(child));
> +		node = of_get_next_available_child(dev->of_node, to_of_node(child));
>  		if (node)
>  			return &node->fwnode;
>  	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) {
>  		struct acpi_device *node;
> 
> -		node = acpi_get_next_child(dev, acpi_node(child));
> +		node = acpi_get_next_child(dev, to_acpi_node(child));
>  		if (node)
>  			return acpi_fwnode_handle(node);
>  	}
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_next_child_node);
>  void fwnode_handle_put(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
>  	if (is_of_node(fwnode))
> -		of_node_put(of_node(fwnode));
> +		of_node_put(to_of_node(fwnode));
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_handle_put);
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 6bc612b..5d8b2b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -2040,14 +2040,14 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  	if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
>  		enum of_gpio_flags flags;
> 
> -		desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(of_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
> +		desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(to_of_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
>  						&flags);
>  		if (!IS_ERR(desc))
>  			active_low = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
>  	} else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
>  		struct acpi_gpio_info info;
> 
> -		desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(acpi_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
> +		desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(to_acpi_node(fwnode), propname, 0,
>  					       &info);
>  		if (!IS_ERR(desc))
>  			active_low = info.active_low;
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> index 15eb3f8..d2d54d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static struct gpio_leds_priv *gpio_leds_create(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			goto err;
>  		}
> 
> -		np = of_node(child);
> +		np = to_of_node(child);
> 
>  		if (fwnode_property_present(child, "label")) {
>  			fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &led.name);
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 8de4fa9..1224be8 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static inline bool is_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  	return fwnode && fwnode->type == FWNODE_ACPI;
>  }
> 
> -static inline struct acpi_device *acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +static inline struct acpi_device *to_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
>  	return is_acpi_node(fwnode) ?
>  		container_of(fwnode, struct acpi_device, fwnode) : NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index e4da5e3..ec3c98e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline acpi_handle acpi_device_handle(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  	return adev ? adev->handle : NULL;
>  }
> 
> -#define ACPI_COMPANION(dev)		acpi_node((dev)->fwnode)
> +#define ACPI_COMPANION(dev)		to_acpi_node((dev)->fwnode)
>  #define ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev)	set_primary_fwnode(dev, (adev) ? \
>  	acpi_fwnode_handle(adev) : NULL)
>  #define ACPI_HANDLE(dev)		acpi_device_handle(ACPI_COMPANION(dev))
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static inline bool is_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  	return false;
>  }
> 
> -static inline struct acpi_device *acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +static inline struct acpi_device *to_acpi_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index b871ff9..f05fdce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline bool is_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  	return fwnode && fwnode->type == FWNODE_OF;
>  }
> 
> -static inline struct device_node *of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +static inline struct device_node *to_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
>  	return fwnode ? container_of(fwnode, struct device_node, fwnode) : NULL;
>  }
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static inline bool is_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  	return false;
>  }
> 
> -static inline struct device_node *of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +static inline struct device_node *to_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> --

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ