linux-kernel - Re: imx: apf27: the board no longer boot with latest git kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:48:20 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@...il.com>
Cc:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: imx: apf27: the board no longer boot with latest git kernel

Hi Philippe,

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@...il.com> wrote:

> I've tested this change, and it works fine.
> In the file drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c, there is :
> #define imx21_gpt_irq_disable imx1_gpt_irq_disable
> #define imx21_gpt_irq_enable imx1_gpt_irq_enable
> So I think that using imx1 or imx21 has the same result;
>
> Do you think I should put both change in on patch ?
> Or is it better to do two patches please ?

I think they should be separate patches.

Let's do the following: you sent the
drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c fix and I will send the dtsi
change.

Thanks,

Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/