linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] kconfig: allow use of relations other than (in)equality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:04:27 +0200
From:	Martin Walch <walch.martin@....de>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, pebolle@...cali.nl,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kconfig: allow use of relations other than (in)equality

Hi,

> 1: allow use of relations other than (in)equality

I know it is a bit late for objections. Still, I want to point out that
this looks to me like a major extension to the language.

Kconfig is a configuration language, and as far as I can tell it is
(intentionally) not Turing complete to keep the configuration simple and
controllable. All relations that have been defined so far check for equality
(or for being not equal). The new relations "<=", ">=", "<", and ">" add more
expressiveness, potentially making the language actually more complex and
reasoning harder.

Once the new relations are added, it will be hard to get rid of them again.
So, should this patch be reconsidered?

Regards,
Martin Walch
-- 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/