lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:58:29 +0000
From:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC:	"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
	"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"dsahern@...il.com" <dsahern@...il.com>,
	"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 3/3] perf,tests: Add cpu_map tests


> 
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:08:45AM -0400, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> >
> > Adding cpu_map tests to check evlist and evsel cpu map
> 
> 
> the test needs to be quiet (unless -v is specified)..

The test includes some cases to check error handling, which will print
some warnings. For example, the user setting is not compatible with
cpumask.
Should I remove the cases which checking error handling?

Thanks,
Kan

> 
> 38: Test cpu map                                             :event (null) can only be monitored
> on CPU 1 18. Other CPUs will be discard.
> event (null) can only be monitored on CPU 18. Other CPUs will be discard.
> event (null) cannot be monitored on the given cpus.Please check cpumask
> Ok
> 
> jirka
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/tests/Build          |   1 +
> >  tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c |   4 ++
> >  tools/perf/tests/cpu-map.c      | 113
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/tests/tests.h        |   1 +
> >  4 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/cpu-map.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/Build b/tools/perf/tests/Build index
> > d20d6e6..abc848e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/Build
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/Build
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ perf-y += sample-parsing.o  perf-y +=
> > parse-no-sample-id-all.o  perf-y += kmod-path.o  perf-y +=
> > thread-map.o
> > +perf-y += cpu-map.o
> >
> >  perf-$(CONFIG_X86) += perf-time-to-tsc.o
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c index c1dde73..5f279e1 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ static struct test {
> >  		.func = test__thread_map,
> >  	},
> >  	{
> > +		.desc = "Test cpu map",
> > +		.func = test__cpu_map,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> >  		.func = NULL,
> >  	},
> >  };
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/cpu-map.c b/tools/perf/tests/cpu-map.c
> > new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fa69aca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/cpu-map.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> > +#include <sys/types.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include "evsel.h"
> > +#include "evlist.h"
> > +#include "tests.h"
> > +#include "debug.h"
> > +
> > +static int do_cpumap(struct target *target,
> > +		     struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> > +		      const char *cpu_list)
> > +{
> > +	struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> > +
> > +	evsel = zalloc(sizeof(struct perf_evsel));
> > +	if (evsel == NULL) {
> > +		pr_debug("failed to alloc evsel\n");
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +	perf_evlist__add(evlist, evsel);
> > +	if (cpu_list != NULL)
> > +		evsel->cpus = cpu_map__new(cpu_list);
> > +	else
> > +		evsel->cpus = NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (perf_evlist__create_maps(evlist, target) < 0)
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int test__cpu_map(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct perf_evlist *evlist;
> > +	struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> > +	struct target target = {
> > +		.uid = UINT_MAX,
> > +	};
> > +	int i, err;
> > +
> > +	/* system wide */
> > +	evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> > +	target.system_wide = true;
> > +	err = do_cpumap(&target, evlist, NULL);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong ret of do_cpumap", 0 == err);
> > +
> > +	evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", cpu_map__nr(evlist-
> >cpus) == cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus));
> > +	for (i = 0; i < cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus); i++)
> > +		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong cpu map", evlist->cpus->map[i]
> == evsel->cpus->map[i]);
> > +	perf_evlist__delete(evlist);
> > +
> > +
> > +	/* system wide + evsel cpumask */
> > +	evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> > +	target.system_wide = true;
> > +	err = do_cpumap(&target, evlist, "0");
> > +
> > +	evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", 1 ==
> cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus));
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong cpu map", 0 == evsel->cpus->map[0]);
> > +	perf_evlist__delete(evlist);
> > +
> > +
> > +	/* defined cpu list */
> > +	evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> > +	target.cpu_list = "0,1,18,26";
> > +	err = do_cpumap(&target, evlist, NULL);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong ret of do_cpumap", 0 == err);
> > +
> > +	evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", 4 ==
> cpu_map__nr(evlist->cpus));
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", cpu_map__nr(evlist-
> >cpus) == cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus));
> > +	for (i = 0; i < cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus); i++)
> > +		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong cpu map", evlist->cpus->map[i]
> == evsel->cpus->map[i]);
> > +	perf_evlist__delete(evlist);
> > +
> > +
> > +	/* defined cpu list + evsel cpumask (all match) */
> > +	evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> > +	target.cpu_list = "0,1,18,26";
> > +	err = do_cpumap(&target, evlist, "1,18");
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong ret of do_cpumap", 0 == err);
> > +
> > +	evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", 4 ==
> cpu_map__nr(evlist->cpus));
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", 2 ==
> cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus));
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong cpu map", 1 == evsel->cpus->map[0]);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong cpu map", 18 == evsel->cpus->map[1]);
> > +	perf_evlist__delete(evlist);
> > +
> > +
> > +	/* defined cpu list + evsel cpumask (partial match) */
> > +	evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> > +	target.cpu_list = "0,1,18,26";
> > +	err = do_cpumap(&target, evlist, "2,18,30");
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong ret of do_cpumap", 0 == err);
> > +
> > +	evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", 4 ==
> cpu_map__nr(evlist->cpus));
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of cpu", 1 ==
> cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus));
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong cpu map", 18 == evsel->cpus->map[0]);
> > +	perf_evlist__delete(evlist);
> > +
> > +
> > +	/* defined cpu list + evsel cpumask (not match) */
> > +	evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> > +	target.cpu_list = "0,1,18,26";
> > +	err = do_cpumap(&target, evlist, "2,9,30");
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong ret of do_cpumap", 0 != err);
> > +	perf_evlist__delete(evlist);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h index
> > ebb47d9..cb6b994 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ int test__fdarray__filter(void);  int
> > test__fdarray__add(void);  int test__kmod_path__parse(void);  int
> > test__thread_map(void);
> > +int test__cpu_map(void);
> >
> >  #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) ||
> > defined(__aarch64__)  #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ