linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 09/11] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:31:14 +0200
From:	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	"peter.maydell@...aro.org" <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
	"agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>,
	"drjones@...hat.com" <drjones@...hat.com>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	"zhichao.huang@...aro.org" <zhichao.huang@...aro.org>,
	"jan.kiszka@...mens.com" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	"dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"r65777@...escale.com" <r65777@...escale.com>,
	"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/11] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug
 support

On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:51:40AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 05:07:41PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> writes:
> > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > >> Are you happy with this?:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >> +/**
> > >> + * kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension
> > >> + *
> > >> + * We currently assume that the number of HW registers is uniform
> > >> + * across all CPUs (see cpuinfo_sanity_check).
> > >> + */
> > >>  int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
> > >>  {
> > >>         int r;
> > >> @@ -64,6 +71,12 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
> > >>         case KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT:
> > >>                 r = cpu_has_32bit_el1();
> > >>                 break;
> > >> +       case KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_BPS:
> > >> +               r = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_INST);
> > >> +               break;
> > >> +       case KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_WPS:
> > >> +               r  = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA);
> > >> +               break;
> > >
> > > Whilst I much prefer this code, it actually adds an unwanted dependency
> > > on PERF_EVENTS that I didn't think about to start with. Sorry to keep
> > > messing you about -- I guess your original patch is the best thing after
> > > all.
> > 
> > Everything looks to be in hw_breakpoint.[ch] which does depend on
> > CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT which depends on PERF_EVENTS to be built.
> > However the previous code depended on this behaviour as well.
> 
> I think your original approach (of sticking stuff in the header file) works
> regardless of the CONFIG option, no?
> 
> > It would seem weird to enable guest debug using HW debug registers to
> > debug the guest yet not allowing the host kernel to use them? Of course
> > this is the only code they would share as all the magic of guest
> > debugging is already mostly there for dirty guest handling.
> > 
> > I'm not familiar with Kconfig but it looks like this is all part of
> > arm64 defconfig. Are people really going to want to disable PERF_EVENTS
> > but still debug their guests with HW support?
> 
> Then it's your call. I just find the host dependency on perf a bit weird
> to get guest debug working (especially as the dependency is completely
> "fake" because we don't use any perf infrastructure at all).
> 
Agreed, let's see if we can avoid this.

Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/