| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 21:37:17 +0200 From: "Espen Carlsen" <ec@...ascale.com> To: "'Paul Bolle'" <pebolle@...cali.nl>, "'Michal Marek'" <mmarek@...e.cz> Cc: <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "'Daniel J Blueman'" <daniel@...ascale.com>, "'Steffen Persvold'" <sp@...ascale.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH, resend] build: fix broken kernel RPM source symlink > From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebolle@...cali.nl] On di, 2015-06-30 at > 13:47 +0200, Espen Carlsen wrote: > > Fix the 'rpm-pkg' makefile target to always generate the correct > > /usr/src/kernel/<ver> symlink; this fails on non-RPM-native systems > /kernels/ > > eg Ubuntu. > > On a non-RPM-native system, the symlink created by rpmbuild points > > to the source tree, so the ln -sf commands to overwrite build and > > source will create a new link inside the directory pointed to by the > > build and source symlinks. This will break the -devel.rpm, as the > > build and source symlinks will point to non-existing directories > > after installing them. > Perhaps this is all obvious but what exactly happens currently and > what happens after this change? (An example might help readers that > are just as easily confused as I am. Perhaps that might also explain > why this is only an issue on non-RPM-native systems.) In my examples, kernel-4.1.0.spec is the kernel.spec file generated from mkspec with the two ln -sf lines commented out to show how it works. This is the how BUILDROOT looks after rpmbuild -bi kernel-4.1.0.spec on an Ubuntu system, notice that on Ubuntu, there are already a 'build' and 'source' symlink before the ln -sf commands are issued, CentOS however doesn't have those links on the same step. user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild$ rpmbuild -bi SPECS/kernel-4.1.0.spec user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild$ cd BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0/ user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ls -gG total 64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 35 Jul 6 18:56 build -> /srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-4.1.0 drwxr-xr-x 5 4096 Jul 6 19:00 kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 640 Jul 6 19:00 modules.alias -rw-r--r-- 1 1272 Jul 6 19:00 modules.alias.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 8897 Jul 6 19:00 modules.builtin -rw-r--r-- 1 11866 Jul 6 19:00 modules.builtin.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 1155 Jul 6 19:00 modules.dep -rw-r--r-- 1 2056 Jul 6 19:00 modules.dep.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 52 Jul 6 19:00 modules.devname -rw-r--r-- 1 682 Jul 6 19:00 modules.order -rw-r--r-- 1 131 Jul 6 19:00 modules.softdep -rw-r--r-- 1 1419 Jul 6 19:00 modules.symbols -rw-r--r-- 1 1484 Jul 6 19:00 modules.symbols.bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 35 Jul 6 19:00 source -> /srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-4.1.0 user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ Now when you manually do the ln -sf ln -sf /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0, user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ln -sf /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 build user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ln -sf /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 source user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ls -gG total 64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 35 Jul 6 18:56 build -> /srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-4.1.0 drwxr-xr-x 5 4096 Jul 6 19:00 kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 640 Jul 6 19:00 modules.alias -rw-r--r-- 1 1272 Jul 6 19:00 modules.alias.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 8897 Jul 6 19:00 modules.builtin -rw-r--r-- 1 11866 Jul 6 19:00 modules.builtin.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 1155 Jul 6 19:00 modules.dep -rw-r--r-- 1 2056 Jul 6 19:00 modules.dep.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 52 Jul 6 19:00 modules.devname -rw-r--r-- 1 682 Jul 6 19:00 modules.order -rw-r--r-- 1 131 Jul 6 19:00 modules.softdep -rw-r--r-- 1 1419 Jul 6 19:00 modules.symbols -rw-r--r-- 1 1484 Jul 6 19:00 modules.symbols.bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 35 Jul 6 19:00 source -> /srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-4.1.0 user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ As you can see, the 'build' and 'source' symlink still points to the same directory as it did before the ln command was issued. Also you can see in the directory pointed to by the 'build' symlink, that a link to the /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 was created as '4.1.0': user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ls -gG build/ total 47084 lrwxrwxrwx 1 22 Jul 6 19:03 4.1.0 -> /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 18693 Jun 30 12:30 COPYING drwxr-xr-x 108 12288 Jun 30 12:30 Documentation -rw-r--r-- 1 2163 Jun 30 12:30 Kbuild -rw-r--r-- 1 252 Jun 30 12:30 Kconfig -rw-r--r-- 1 54359 Jun 30 12:30 Makefile -rw-r--r-- 1 455465 Jul 6 19:00 Module.symvers -rw-r--r-- 1 3268556 Jul 6 19:00 System.map drwxr-xr-x 33 4096 Jul 6 19:00 arch drwxr-xr-x 3 4096 Jul 6 18:58 block drwxr-xr-x 4 4096 Jul 6 18:58 crypto drwxr-xr-x 122 4096 Jul 6 19:00 drivers drwxr-xr-x 36 4096 Jul 6 19:00 firmware drwxr-xr-x 76 12288 Jul 6 18:59 fs drwxr-xr-x 30 4096 Jul 4 18:15 include drwxr-xr-x 2 4096 Jul 6 19:00 init drwxr-xr-x 2 4096 Jul 6 18:58 ipc drwxr-xr-x 16 12288 Jul 6 18:59 kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 3662 Jul 4 18:20 kernel.spec drwxr-xr-x 11 20480 Jul 6 18:59 lib drwxr-xr-x 3 12288 Jul 6 18:58 mm -rw-r--r-- 1 8897 Jul 6 18:58 modules.builtin -rw-r--r-- 1 682 Jul 6 19:00 modules.order drwxr-xr-x 59 4096 Jul 6 19:00 net drwxr-xr-x 15 4096 Jun 30 12:30 samples drwxr-xr-x 14 4096 Jul 6 19:00 scripts drwxr-xr-x 9 4096 Jul 6 18:58 security drwxr-xr-x 23 4096 Jul 6 18:59 sound drwxr-xr-x 21 4096 Jun 30 12:30 tools drwxr-xr-x 2 4096 Jul 6 18:58 usr drwxr-xr-x 3 4096 Jun 30 12:30 virt -rwxr-xr-x 1 24870599 Jul 6 19:00 vmlinux -rw-r--r-- 1 26536701 Jul 6 19:00 vmlinux.o user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ Now, if I instead add -T to the ln command, like this: user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ln -sfT /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 build user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ln -sfT /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 source user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ ls -gG total 64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 22 Jul 6 19:06 build -> /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 drwxr-xr-x 5 4096 Jul 6 19:00 kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 640 Jul 6 19:00 modules.alias -rw-r--r-- 1 1272 Jul 6 19:00 modules.alias.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 8897 Jul 6 19:00 modules.builtin -rw-r--r-- 1 11866 Jul 6 19:00 modules.builtin.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 1155 Jul 6 19:00 modules.dep -rw-r--r-- 1 2056 Jul 6 19:00 modules.dep.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 52 Jul 6 19:00 modules.devname -rw-r--r-- 1 682 Jul 6 19:00 modules.order -rw-r--r-- 1 131 Jul 6 19:00 modules.softdep -rw-r--r-- 1 1419 Jul 6 19:00 modules.symbols -rw-r--r-- 1 1484 Jul 6 19:00 modules.symbols.bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 22 Jul 6 19:06 source -> /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-4.1.0-1.x86_64/lib/modules/4.1.0$ You can see that it overwrites the existing symlink with the correct one instead of creating a new link inside the directory pointed to by the old symlink. To sum it all up, without the change to mkspec, the package 'kernel-devel' package generated on an Ubuntu system is broken, as '/lib/modules/4.1.0/build' points to a directory that will not be on the server where the package is installed on: user@...ld-ubuntu:/srv/user/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpm -qplv kernel-devel-4.1.0-1.x86_64.rpm lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Jul 4 18:31 /lib/modules/4.1.0/build -> /srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-4.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Jul 6 12:15 /lib/modules/4.1.0/source -> /srv/user/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-4.1.0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 6 12:15 /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 > It doesn't help that the description of -T in "man ln" is rather > unhelpful. "info ln" was better, after following some references, but > I'm still not sure what it buys you for this issue. > > --- a/scripts/package/mkspec > > +++ b/scripts/package/mkspec > > > -echo "ln -sf /usr/src/kernels/$KERNELRELEASE build" > > -echo "ln -sf /usr/src/kernels/$KERNELRELEASE source" > > +echo "ln -sfT /usr/src/kernels/$KERNELRELEASE build" > > +echo "ln -sfT /usr/src/kernels/$KERNELRELEASE source" Espen Carlsen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists