linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND 09/10] regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to duty-cycle call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:52:56 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND 09/10] regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to
 duty-cycle call

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:45:03PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> > You just added this function in the previous patch?

> You're right, it does look a little weird contained in a single
> patch-set.  The submission in the previous patch is the tried and
> tested (i.e. in real releases) method written by ST.  This patch
> contains a simplification provided by me.  IMO it looks and performs
> better, but doesn't have the same time-under-test that the original
> method does.  I'm merely ensuring we keep some history in order so
> provide and easy way back i.e. revert.

> If I have any say at all, I'd really like to keep this piece of
> history.

OK, that makes sense - can you put the above in the commit message
please?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)