linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 8/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to duty-cycle call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue,  7 Jul 2015 16:06:52 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kernel@...inux.com, broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to duty-cycle call

If we reverse some of the logic and change the formula used,
we can simplify the function greatly.

It is intentional that this function is supplied and then re-worked
within the same patch-set.  The submission in the previous patch is
the tried and tested (i.e. in real releases) method written by ST.
This patch contains a simplification provided later.  It looks and
performs better, but doesn't have the same time-under-test that the
original method does.  The idea is that we keep some history in
order to provide an easy way back i.e. revert.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 27 +++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
index dac145d..d5cb267 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
@@ -93,26 +93,13 @@ static int pwm_regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 /**
  * Continuous voltage call-backs
  */
-static int pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
-					int volt_mV)
+static int pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int req_uV)
 {
-	struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	int min_mV = rdev->constraints->min_uV / 1000;
-	int max_mV = rdev->constraints->max_uV / 1000;
-	int max_duty_cycle = drvdata->max_duty_cycle;
-	int vdiff = min_mV - max_mV;
-	int pwm_code;
-	int tmp;
-
-	tmp = ((max_duty_cycle - min_mV) * max_duty_cycle) / vdiff;
-	pwm_code = ((tmp + max_duty_cycle) * volt_mV) / vdiff;
-
-	if (pwm_code < 0)
-		pwm_code = 0;
-	if (pwm_code > max_duty_cycle)
-		pwm_code = max_duty_cycle;
-
-	return pwm_code * 100 / max_duty_cycle;
+	int min_uV = rdev->constraints->min_uV;
+	int max_uV = rdev->constraints->max_uV;
+	int diff = max_uV - min_uV;
+
+	return 100 - ((((req_uV * 100) - (min_uV * 100)) / diff));
 }
 
 static int pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
@@ -131,7 +118,7 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	int duty_cycle;
 	int ret;
 
-	duty_cycle = pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle(rdev, min_uV / 1000);
+	duty_cycle = pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle(rdev, min_uV);
 
 	ret = pwm_config(drvdata->pwm,
 			 (drvdata->pwm->period / 100) * duty_cycle,
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/