lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 21:08:10 -0400 From: Sreenath Madasu <sreenath.madasu@...il.com> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Cc: jteki@...nedev.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Warnings : Fixed 80 character length warning in rtw_ap.c The kernelnewbies.org guide said "For your first patch, only pick one warning". That is the reason why I fixed one warning. Thanks Sreenath On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:53:26 -0400, Sreenath Madasu said: > > When the checkpatch.pl script was run, it showed lines with length > > more than 80 characters in rtw_ap.c file. Fixed line number 382 by > > breaking it up into two lines within 80 characters. > > > > - stainfo_offset = rtw_stainfo_offset(pstapriv, psta); > > + stainfo_offset = > > + rtw_stainfo_offset(pstapriv, psta); > > if (stainfo_offset_valid(stainfo_offset)) > > chk_alive_list[chk_alive_num++] = stainfo_offset; > > Umm... Sreenath? > > There's 97 more occurrences of the same problem in that file. > > All: Is it time to kill that checkpatch test, or hide it behind a non-default > flag, to prevent code churn? > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists