lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:25:57 +0100 From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Applied "regulator: pwm-regulator: Small clean-ups" to the regulator tree The patch regulator: pwm-regulator: Small clean-ups has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From f3f6439d8635d783f145b321db3049369e745799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:35:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: pwm-regulator: Small clean-ups Remove over-bracketing, use framework API to fetch PWM period and be more forthcoming that pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle() actually returns duty cycle as a percentage, rather than a register value. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> --- drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c index d92e66772ec0..936e387cc532 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c @@ -92,13 +92,13 @@ static int pwm_regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, /** * Continuous voltage call-backs */ -static int pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int req_uV) +static int pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle_percentage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int req_uV) { int min_uV = rdev->constraints->min_uV; int max_uV = rdev->constraints->max_uV; int diff = max_uV - min_uV; - return 100 - ((((req_uV * 100) - (min_uV * 100)) / diff)); + return 100 - (((req_uV * 100) - (min_uV * 100)) / diff); } static int pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev) @@ -114,14 +114,13 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, { struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev); unsigned int ramp_delay = rdev->constraints->ramp_delay; + unsigned int period = pwm_get_period(drvdata->pwm); int duty_cycle; int ret; - duty_cycle = pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle(rdev, min_uV); + duty_cycle = pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle_percentage(rdev, min_uV); - ret = pwm_config(drvdata->pwm, - (drvdata->pwm->period / 100) * duty_cycle, - drvdata->pwm->period); + ret = pwm_config(drvdata->pwm, (period / 100) * duty_cycle, period); if (ret) { dev_err(&rdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n"); return ret; -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists