| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:13:38 +0300
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, nicstange@...il.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [mminit] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:09:10AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>
>
> Can you check if this patch addresses the problem please?
>
> ---8<---
> mm, meminit: replace rwsem with completion
>
> From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
>
> Commit 0e1cc95b4cc7 ("mm: meminit: finish initialisation of struct pages
> before basic setup") introduced a rwsem to signal completion of the
> initialization workers.
>
> Lockdep complains about possible recursive locking:
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 4.1.0-12802-g1dc51b8 #3 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------
> swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
> (pgdat_init_rwsem){++++.+},
> at: [<ffffffff8424c7fb>] page_alloc_init_late+0xc7/0xe6
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (pgdat_init_rwsem){++++.+},
> at: [<ffffffff8424c772>] page_alloc_init_late+0x3e/0xe6
>
> Replace the rwsem by a completion together with an atomic
> "outstanding work counter".
>
> [peterz@...radead.org: Barrier removal on the grounds of being pointless]
> [mgorman@...e.de: Applied review feedback]
> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 506eac8b38af..a69e78c396a0 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/rwsem.h>
> #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> #include <linux/bootmem.h>
> @@ -1062,7 +1061,15 @@ static void __init deferred_free_range(struct page *page,
> __free_pages_boot_core(page, pfn, 0);
> }
>
> -static __initdata DECLARE_RWSEM(pgdat_init_rwsem);
> +/* Completion tracking for deferred_init_memmap() threads */
> +static atomic_t pgdat_init_n_undone __initdata;
> +static __initdata DECLARE_COMPLETION(pgdat_init_all_done_comp);
> +
> +static inline void __init pgdat_init_report_one_done(void)
> +{
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pgdat_init_n_undone))
> + complete(&pgdat_init_all_done_comp);
> +}
>
> /* Initialise remaining memory on a node */
> static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data)
> @@ -1079,7 +1086,7 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data)
> const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
>
> if (first_init_pfn == ULONG_MAX) {
> - up_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
> + pgdat_init_report_one_done();
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1179,7 +1186,8 @@ free_range:
>
> pr_info("node %d initialised, %lu pages in %ums\n", nid, nr_pages,
> jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
> - up_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
> +
> + pgdat_init_report_one_done();
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1187,14 +1195,14 @@ void __init page_alloc_init_late(void)
> {pgdat_init_rwsempgdat_init_rwsempgdat_init_rwsem
> int nid;
>
> + /* There will be num_node_state(N_MEMORY) threads */
> + atomic_set(&pgdat_init_n_undone, num_node_state(N_MEMORY));
> for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
> - down_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
Rw-sem have special "non-owner" mode for keeping lockdep away.
This should be enough:
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data)
const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data)
const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
if (first_init_pfn == ULONG_MAX) {
- up_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
+ up_read_non_owner(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
return 0;
}
@@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ free_range:
pr_info("node %d initialised, %lu pages in %ums\n", nid, nr_pages,
jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
- up_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
+ up_read_non_owner(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
return 0;
}
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ void __init page_alloc_init_late(void)
int nid;
for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
- down_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
+ down_read_non_owner(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
kthread_run(deferred_init_memmap, NODE_DATA(nid),
"pgdatinit%d", nid);
}
if (first_init_pfn == ULONG_MAX) {
- up_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
+ up_read_non_owner(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
return 0;
}
@@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ free_range:
pr_info("node %d initialised, %lu pages in %ums\n", nid, nr_pages,
jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
- up_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
+ up_read_non_owner(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
return 0;
}
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ void __init page_alloc_init_late(void)
int nid;
for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
- down_read(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
+ down_read_non_owner(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
kthread_run(deferred_init_memmap, NODE_DATA(nid),
"pgdatinit%d", nid);
}
> kthread_run(deferred_init_memmap, NODE_DATA(nid), "pgdatinit%d", nid);
> }
>
> /* Block until all are initialised */
> - down_write(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
> - up_write(&pgdat_init_rwsem);
> + wait_for_completion(&pgdat_init_all_done_comp);
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT */
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists